Search for: "United States v. Gross" Results 781 - 800 of 1,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2024, 10:31 am
Co., 140 A.D.2d 167, 168, 527 N.Y.S.2d 420, 421 (1st Dep't 1988) 3 United States Fidel. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 10:31 am by Sean_Callanan
Co., 140 A.D.2d 167, 168, 527 N.Y.S.2d 420, 421 (1st Dep't 1988) 3 United States Fidel. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  To qualify for a tax benefit, a project must either have twenty percent or more of the units under rent control and occupied by individuals with incomes of one-half or less of the median gross income in the local area, or have forty percent or more of the units under rent control and occupied by individuals with incomes sixty percent or less of the area’s median gross income. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
The SDNY’s Criminal Information and Sentencing Memorandum in Cohen’s case also discussed the reimbursement being “‘grossed up’ for tax purposes. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:48 am by Neil Cahn
In its June 17, 2020 decision in Matter of Abramson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Alan Horowitz
Introduction Depending on how the Court resolves a threshold issue, United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:56 am
To say that the case divided the Justices would be a gross understatement. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
Thus, the Excessive Fines Clause is violated where the fine is “grossly disproportional to the gravity of [the) offense” (United States v Bajakajlan, 524 US 321, 334 [1998]; see Canavan, 1 NY3d at 140). [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
A recent United States Tax Court decision, Smyth v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:33 am
Macy's saving grace was based on the United States and the California Constitutions, which both prevent discriminatory tax schemes like this one, typically referred to as a "tandem tax. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 11:20 am by Gregory Forman
United States Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson’s wry if not cynical observation, concurring in Brown v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:30 am by Randy Barnett
 But is this theory applicable to the President of the United States? [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]