Search for: "United States v. Houston" Results 781 - 800 of 1,198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2010, 7:49 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Also, this issue was discussed by the Court of Appeals in Houston, in the 1999 case, Frazer v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:42 am by Susan Brenner
On May 2, 2008, the Director of Security for FPL advised United States Secret Service agents `that an individual, without authorization, accessed the `GEXA Energy' . . . system in Houston. . . . [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
’ In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, supra. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Joshua Matz
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 2:50 pm by Josh Blackman
"He's the most important Supreme Court justice, certainly of the first 100 years of the United States," Finkelman said. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 2:20 pm by NCC Staff
Josh Blackman is an Associate Professor of Law at the South Texas College of Law in Houston who specializes in constitutional law, the United States Supreme Court, and the intersection of law and technology. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 8:24 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This requirement to obtain written permission was upheld in the 1993, Houston Court of Appeals [1 Dist.] case, United States Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402, and (apparently) Jordan v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:40 am
A 44-year-man whose lawyers claim he is mentally retarded is scheduled to be executed Thursday evening in Huntsville, Tex., unless the United States Supreme Court agrees to hear his case. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Sea Star Line, LLC, 06-606 QP: "Whether the Carmack Amendment applies to the inland leg of a multimodal shipment to a place in the United States from a place in a territory of the United States even if the inland carrier does not issue a separate bill of lading for the inland leg. [read post]