Search for: "United States v. Idaho" Results 781 - 800 of 876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 6:21 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of the plaintiffs (Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:33 am
United States v, Driggers,__ F.3d __, No. 07-31090, 2009 WL 692003 (9th Cir. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a judgment (including attorney's fees) against a father who claimed that permitting a woman, but not a man, to terminate a pregnancy violates the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 1:41 pm
Idaho, 392 F.3d 350, 356-57 (9th Cir. 2004). [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 10:31 am
United States Supreme Court to rule on State's ban on use of union fees for political activityYsursa v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 5:33 pm
Williams, United States Magistrate Judge) BACKGROUND: The original decision in question here was discussed in a prior ESA blawg (June 2008). [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP)   Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46)   Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46)   United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office)   United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance)… [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm by Jimmy Verner
Hague cases: A federal district court abused its discretion by deferring to a state court when asked to identify the habitual residence of the children and whether they had been wrongfully removed to the United States from Israel. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 7:23 pm
Which is a relevant question, since that's what defendants are now doing (and what the United States files suit to enjoin).Judge McKeown frames the question as follows: "In this appeal, we are asked to determine the unusual question whether dogs are 'livestock.'" And while the district court said that they weren't, and hence granted summary judgment to the United States, Judge McKeown disagrees. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:20 pm
  In 1973, Earl and Iona Monroe, owners of a plot of land along the Middle Fork of the Clearwater River in Idaho, including a twoacre tract, granted the United States a scenic easement under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, 16 U.S.C. [read post]