Search for: "United States v. Lawrence" Results 781 - 800 of 1,747
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2015, 3:50 am by Amy Howe
At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley explains why “the biggest beneficiary of a win for Texas” in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 pm by Mark Graber
 One might think that the very conservative Supreme Court’s refusal to overrule Roe and recognize a right to homosexual sodomy in Lawrence v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that an individual who surrenders his guns to police and is then convicted of a felony has the right to transfer those guns to an independent third party, including by selling them. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Resource Investments v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court recently heard reargument on whether the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:42 am by Lawrence Baum
Baum’s primary interest is in courts in the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:31 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The reason for the issuance was stated as “quit. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Virginia, and then the same time between Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Lawrence “Lee” Loomis, Loomis Wealth Solutions, LLC, John Hagener, and Lismar Financial Services, LLCCase Number: 10-cv-00458 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California)Case Filed: February 23, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 21, 2015 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-34 SEC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In 2003, when the Supreme Court finally overruled Bowers, Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
  (Indeed, the Brief artfully says nothing about whether any of the Originalism Scholars think that Lawrence v. [read post]