Search for: "United States v. Long"
Results 781 - 800
of 21,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
For that purpose we consider the legal position of the subsidiary units of government in the United States and their relationship to federal power. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 7:31 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 8:55 am
To begin with, the common name for the country we live in is … the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
DISCRIMINATION Suffolk County has made international news as a focal point of racism in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
I have been referred, helpfully, to a number of Canadian and United States of America cases touching on the matters under review: cases such as Loper v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 8:21 pm
Murr v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:18 am
In Wilson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:31 am
(Eugene Volokh) After a long discussion of the breadth of the speech restriction involved in the case, Chief Justice Roberts’ majority in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm
Some of the best policyholder lawyers in the United States have volunteered considerable time to support United Policyholders Covid Loss Recovery Initiative. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Sheila Vélez Martinez Despite our long historical presence, there is a general sociolegal invisibility of Latina/os in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:21 am
The test focused on: Whether the wrongful conduct occurred in the United States; and Whether the wrongful conduct had a substantial effect in the United States or upon United States citizens. [read post]
