Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 781 - 800
of 10,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:39 am
That proceeding was dismissed on the ground that Mid City failed to file an appeal with the United States Department of Transportation. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 6:07 pm
X v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
Prudential, a global insurance company, trademarked PRU and other PRU-formative marks in the United States and other countries (but not China) in 2002. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
(Heckman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
With this history in mind, along with (i) foundational principles of state judicial practice and (ii) the shortcomings of the United States Supreme Court’s approach to fractured opinions in Marks v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
” It conditionally criminalized aiding or abetting most abortions if the United States Supreme Court later overruled Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 7:33 am
Similarly, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Yellowfin Yachts, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
“Mark, you should call Jeff. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Williams Cos. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
(For more on this, see Chambers v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:18 am
The Board placed emphasis on the place of the use of the mark in arriving and their decision, stating that there was strong evidence suggesting that Standard Hotels in the United States despite documentation referring to advertisements and promotional campaigns targeting EU customers. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:55 am
In a 1992 Supreme Court decision, Dawson v. [read post]
Case Preview: Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (Case ID: 2021/0201).
21 Feb 2023, 7:35 am
In this post, Rachel Free (Partner), Toby Sears (Partner) and Omri Shirion (Associate) of the CMS Intellectual Property team, preview the UK Supreme Court’s upcoming hearing of Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:45 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
