Search for: "United States v. State of Louisiana" Results 781 - 800 of 2,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2008, 9:45 pm
“The United States,” Acting Solicitor General Gregory G. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by David Cohen - Guest
  The plurality of four refused to revisit the Slaughter-House Cases (1873) or United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:59 am by Amy Howe
” At Illinois Public Radio, Verity Winship weighs in on United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:50 am by Steven Cohen
Candy Fleet, LLC – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – November 29th, 2016) involves a claim of negligence, unseaworthiness, wrongful denial of maintenance and cure, and wrongful termination by plaintiff (Kidd) against the defendant (Candy Fleet). [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:49 am by Steven Cohen
Marquette Transportation Company, LLC, et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana –  April 11th, 2019) comes forth from injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff when he slipped and fell on the deck of the M/V Steve Richoux, which is owned and operated by the defendant. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Louisiana couples’ lawyers, in urging the Supreme Court to take on their case now along with any of those it accepted from the Sixth Circuit, made four points in favor of early review of the Louisiana case: First, the judge’s decision in favor of the ban was the first in the nation to uphold a state ban in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 10:45 am
His mission to the United States will culminate in a report that will be presented to the U.N. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
In Re: FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Products Liability Litigation, Age v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:40 pm by Holland & Hart
” This provision, section two of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), was not at issue in the 2014 Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am by Charlotte Law Library
Lyle Dennison, reporter for the SCOTUSblog (Supreme Court of the United States Blog), stated in his blog dated June 20th, 2011 that it appears that each woman in the class-action suit in Dukes v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 7:24 am by Steven Cohen
United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – February 5th, 2019) involves a claim for asbestos exposure. [read post]