Search for: "United States v. Stevens" Results 781 - 800 of 4,055
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court will consider whether, to convict defendant in U.S. illegally for violating a federal gun-possession law, prosecutors must show that defendant knew he was in the country illegally. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 2:29 am by NCC Staff
An excellent student, Stevens graduated from the University of Chicago and Northwestern University Law, and he also served in the United States Navy as a code breaker. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 431 U.S. 291 (1977) (same, despite Justice Stevens’ argument in dissent, id. at 317, 321, that obscenity law should only be enforceable through civil remedies); New York v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 431 U.S. 291 (1977) (same, despite Justice Stevens' argument in dissent, id. at 317, 321, that obscenity law should only be enforceable through civil remedies); New York v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
The significance is not so much, as Sir John Stevens concluded in 2003, that the murder could have been prevented, though I entirely concur with this finding. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will decide whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine, may relate to challenges to the president’s authority to declare a national emergency allowing construction of a border wall. [read post]