Search for: "United States v. Stock" Results 781 - 800 of 2,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
United States, in which the five conservatives reunited in a 5–4 majority holding that “money compensation” does not include employee stock options. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:14 am
In 2018, most spectacularly, the United States cut its rate from 35% to 21%. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:35 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
United States received less attention in yesterday's news media. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court ruled 5-4 that stock options are not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, a case about whether employee stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act of 1937. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm by Daniel Hemel
United States, which holds that railroad employees are exempt from federal employment taxes on stock-based compensation. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, concluding that (contra the position advanced by the IRS), stocks do not constitute "money renumeration" and are therefore not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Amy Howe
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm by Giles Peaker
In O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, the H [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm by scottgaille
  The Howey Test, deriving from a decades-old case, Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 1:52 am by Jon Gelman
Contributions to the fund are made by each mutual association or stock company which writes compensation or employer's liability insurance in the State of New Jersey in accordance with statutory assessments. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Kelsey Farish
The answer, at Federal District level in the United States at least, is "maybe".In May 2012, stock images company DRK Photo sued textbook publishing giant McGraw-Hill for alleged copyright infringement. [read post]