Search for: "United States v. That Certain Real Property" Results 781 - 800 of 1,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Russell Spivak
Following up on a campaign pledge to end “sanctuary cities” as part of his immigration policy, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13768, Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
The Baze Decision On April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issuedits plurality opinion in Baze v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
The obvious answer is the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which states “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
Title I shifts the due date for the review from Dec. 31 to Sept. 30 and requires the secretary to retain certain documentation of his or her consultation with relevant stakeholders in drafting the review. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:21 pm
Because the dog sniff violated neither the United States Constitution nor the Indiana Constitution, we reverse and remand.In Aaron Kemp v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm by Sasha Volokh
In effect, my rights as a landowner are being controlled by my competitor in the real-estate market. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:39 pm by Fernando M. Pinguelo
Lexington Insurance, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, granted a motion for Rule 37 Discovery Sanctions brought by defendant Lexington Insurance Co. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:39 pm by Fernando M. Pinguelo
Lexington Insurance, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, granted a motion for Rule 37 Discovery Sanctions brought by defendant Lexington Insurance Co. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 4:10 pm
ECUSA's strategy is geared toward getting an appropriate case into the United States Supreme Court, in its own good time. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
Like any polymer, DNA is made up of repeating monomer units, connected by chemical bonds to form one larger molecule. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by Jim von der Heydt
--This may not be legal realism, but it is, as of July, real. [read post]