Search for: "United States v. That Certain Real Property"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The United States is party to 51, including the North American Free Trade Agreement. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Or does the existence of inexpensive drones present a novel Fourth Amendment concern that will require a novel doctrine to address it, as the Supreme Court arguably charted new courses regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:46 am
As Wikipedia explains, bankruptcy in the United Statesis a matter placed under federal jurisdiction by the United States Constitution (in Article 1,Section 8, Clause 4), which allows Congress to enact `uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States’. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:40 pm
Legislation Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/114_uslegislation.html3 bills were added:S.184: Oregon Coastal Land ActS.501: New Mexico Navajo Water Settlement Technical Corrections ActS.871: A bill to provide for the addition of certain real property to the reservation of the Siletz Tribe in the State of Oregon [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Under pressure from certain lobbies that sought to have substantive patent law removed from EU law, the regulation (Articles 5, 7 and 18) actually refrains from regulating the substantive law of patents with unitary effect. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 1:11 am
"At the earliest" because there could be significant delay (for example, I could see Samsung appeal certain issues, possibly relating to the '647 claim construction but also the exclusion of real-world damages evidence, to the Supreme Court if necessary). [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 12:13 am
Motorola v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
In Skawski v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am
” © will kill the small women entrepreneur—there are so few economic opportunities for women without capital here, but if some women own certain motifs, they lose that. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:17 am
As FBI Director James Comey eloquently put it, “There are two kinds of big companies in the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:39 am
Hansen In Donahue Schriber Realty Group, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:26 am
The Court rendered a decision in 2011, Mosley v The United Kingdom [2011] ECHR 774 (10 May 2011). [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
A recent case in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Stine, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
”)…While we have held that a sale is “not limited to the transfer of tangible property” but may also be determined by “the agreement by which such a transfer takes place,” Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
In this decision, the Supreme Court said in substance that the Negro is not a citizen of the United States; he is merely property, subject to the dictates of his owner. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
