Search for: "WELLS v. EDWARDS" Results 781 - 800 of 2,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am by Edward Craven, Matrix.
It is well established that the courts are under a duty to construe domestic legislation which has been enacted to give effect to the UK’s obligations under the EU Treaty so as to give effect to those obligations (Pickstone v Freemans plc [1989] AC 66; Litster v Forth Dry Dock & Engineering Co Ltd [1990] 1 AC 546). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:01 am
The first decision is Geolabs Ltd v Geo Laboratories and Edwards, an extempore Patents County Court (England and Wales) ruling from Judge Colin Birss QC on Monday of this week, noted on the Lawtel subscription-only service. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:03 am
The first decision is Geolabs Ltd v Geo Laboratories and Edwards, an extempore Patents County Court (England and Wales) ruling from Judge Colin Birss QC on Monday of this week, noted on the Lawtel subscription-only service. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:44 am by Amy Howe
Founded by Edward Blum, a former stockbroker who also backed the challenger in Fisher (as well as the challengers in Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Edward Mannino offers some takeaways from the decision here. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Mark Merenda
It is telling that the bits I liked best were actual Shakespeare: like the on-stage performance of Henry V, in which the audience is so stirred by Henry’s St. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Mark Merenda
It is telling that the bits I liked best were actual Shakespeare: like the on-stage performance of Henry V, in which the audience is so stirred by Henry’s St. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Sony Music Entertainment, et al., No. 15-1518 (Claim construction in IPRs – pro se case) Interference: Edward Tobinick v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Sony Music Entertainment, et al., No. 15-1518 (Claim construction in IPRs – pro se case) Interference: Edward Tobinick v. [read post]
In its discussion of Moyes, the Court challenged the Moyes court’s “reasonableness” and slight affect approach to employee non-solicitation provisions and contrasted it with the plain language of 16600 and subsequent case law in the California Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Potential Changes to Fund of Funds Arrangements Posted by Thomas Hiller, Brian McCabe, and Edward Baer, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Friday, February 1, 2019 Tags: Exchange-traded funds, Investment advisers, Investment Advisers Act, Investor protection, Risk management, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Section 12(d), Securities regulation The Latest on Proxy Access Posted by Holly J. [read post]
28 May 2017, 1:47 pm by Giles Peaker
Bretby Hall Management Company Ltd v Pratt [2017] UKUT 70 (LC) This was an appeal to the UT on various issue arising from an FTT decision. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
  The petitioners – including Intel, Edwards Lifesciences Corp., and Edwards Lifesciences LLC – brought suit alleging that the Fintiv rule exceeds the PTO’s statutory authority under the America Invents Act (AIA) and is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). [read post]