Search for: "WORTHY v. UNITED STATES"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
On this point, and because both the Complainant and the Respondent appear to reside in the United States, the Panel decides to indeed decide this case using United States trademark law. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm
Ever since the notion of an operational duty was first enunciated in Osman v United Kingdom (2000) 29 EHRR 245, it has become something of a judicial mantra that the threshold for establishing a “real and immediate” threat was high (see for example Re Officer L [2007] UKHL 36, and Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] AC 681 [41] and [66],). [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 8:56 am
United States, No. 10-371-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:17 pm
The 3 or 10 year bar has been in place because of the illegal presence of these individuals in the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm
United States (2001) (dissenting). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am
In the courts Jean PEARSON v the United Kingdom – 40957/07 [2011] ECHR 2319 (13 December 2011). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
In 1853, Charles Bishop Goodrich published The Science of Government: As Exhibited in the Institutions of the United States, a popular early treatise on US government. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
The Queen on the application of Naik v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1546 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:17 am
Judge Aldisert of USCA3 lets appellate defense counsel have it with both barrels in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
Recovery of Medicaid Liens Upheld In 2011, the long-standing procedures regarding the recovery of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Medicaid liens were upheld as valid by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on June 29, 2011 in its fifty-nine (59) paged decision in the case of Tristani v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:33 am
Otherwise, chances are pretty good that they will believe that you ruined their chances of "justice" by failing to raise that winner point, the one you left on the table.But try to cover them all and you can anticipate some snarky judge to write what Third Circuit Judge Aldisert did in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:40 am
(Orin Kerr) From the introduction to United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
All this is worthy of our #6 spot. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am
” Chancellor Strine, however, appears to be that rare species of jurist who, unlike the majority of the United States Supreme Court, understands the reality of contingent fee litigation. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
It’s not retaliation against him, though, because he claims the address actually belongs to a “United States Judge” (by which he means a state judge, even though any lawyer would interpret that as a reference to a federal judge), and that I am PUTTING A JUDGE IN DANGER. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:46 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a lot about the Ninth Circuit’s en banc case in United States v. [read post]
