Search for: "Walker v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2019, 5:59 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:49 am
The First Department has sustained a sex and race discrimination claim, restating that pleading standards in state court are quite different from federal law and that the plaintiff in this case has a legitimate claim against the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.The case is Walker v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm
Everyone who teaches first-year crim inevitably teaches the two competing frameworks of the criminal law: the common law v. the Model Penal Code. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:45 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:23 am
On Tuesday the First Department was confronted by these issues in People v Corliss, 2008 NY Slip Op 01869, which involved a prosecution for an attempted parachute jump off the Empire State Building. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
Lord Walker dissents on the issue of justification. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 6:46 am
Walker, 547 F.3d 387, 392 (2d Cir. 2008) . [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 8:55 am
Supreme Court decided New York Times v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:35 am
Here’s how Justice Kennedy described the role of the factual record in conducting rational basis review in Heller v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:03 am
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit held oral arguments on March 21, 2023 in the international trademark case of Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 11:01 am
Walker v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:06 pm
Walker (D. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:41 pm
Talao, 222 F.3d 1133, 1137 (9th Cir.2000); Walker v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
WalkerIn Muzzy Ranch v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
WalkerIn Muzzy Ranch v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:45 pm
(See, e.g., Findlay v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:37 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
