Search for: "Waters v. Superior Court"
Results 781 - 800
of 902
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2009, 1:06 pm
Courtney Michelle Love, filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles on May 26, 2009. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:16 pm
Auth. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:18 pm
These opinions are alleged to be defamatory and are the subject of an action in the Superior Court of Ontario. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
There was some hope that the court would alter the doctrine of respondeat superior and include a good faith defense or limit the doctrine to higher level employees. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
In Ronwin v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:54 am
Those questions recently were addressed by a New Jersey appellate court in Stengart v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
Commonwealth Human Relations Comm'n v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 10:55 pm
" Indeed, you don't have to go far to see the limits of Iqbal; just last month the District Court in Padilla v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1213. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1213. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 3:34 pm
In Jackson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
The Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:37 am
That would be an interesting argument indeed, but I question whether it will carry much water in a court, before a judge or jurors, who in my experience are unsympathetic even to minor tax frauds, to say nothing of allegedly insane douchenozzles and alien lizard people. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:30 pm
Proposition 65, as interpreted by the Court of Appeal in AFL-CIO v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:05 pm
Lackawanna Dec. 4, 2008)Minora, J. (14 pages).Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas Judge Carmen Minora held that a developer can be found liable for storm water runoff even where his water runoff system met minimal regulatory requirements. [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:35 pm
The case is reported at U.S. v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:09 am
One positive side-effect of the change will be that the Upper Tribunal is a superior court of record and so its decisions ought to constitute binding authority on RPT’s and LVT’s. [read post]
4 May 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 273. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Implications of the Fly in the Water Bottle < Barbara J. [read post]
