Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me." Results 781 - 800 of 6,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 4:01 pm by Will Baude
My pondering this and other questions that I teach in Federal Courts led me to write an article about these entities, and last week I finally posted a draft on SSRN. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:03 am
    The source of the anonymous tip contacted me about two weeks ago with the same tip and I followed up and talked to many in the patent community and no one seemed to think that was what the Patent Office was doing at all. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
You aren’t going to hear it from me. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Private copying levy systems are not harmonised in the EU, and some Member States do not even collect levies or decided to get rid of them altogether. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 9:06 pm
Zurawska This week on Hull on Estates, Christopher Graham and Paul Trudelle discuss the recent decision in the case of Piszczek v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:09 pm
Concepcion, in which the Supreme Court heard oral argument last week. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:02 am
That's what makes me nervous for the State about the granting without oral argument. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:15 am by Walter Olson
I go on to discuss California’s Serrano v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 8:46 pm
It makes me uncomfortable about the death penalty. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Specifically, Syed argued that the State failed to disclose potentially exculpatory evidence (a fax cover sheet disclaiming the reliability of the cell phone records), which violated the State’s duty imposed by Brady v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:28 pm by David Oscar Markus
Also in Tallahassee, Miami lawyers Tara Kawass and Chris DeCoste have started trial in State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:34 am
  In State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 11:52 pm
Last May I mentioned an ongoing research project I'm doing for the National Center for the Prosecution of Child Abuse that has me reading every new case interpreting Crawford v. [read post]