Search for: "Wiley" Results 781 - 800 of 2,351
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2016, 4:26 am
John Wiley & Sons, 568 U.S. ___ (2013) (see Kat report here).This time around, the question presented was whether Kirtsaeng could recover his attorney’s fees (totalling over $2 million) from John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:25 pm by Paul Caron
Baruch Lev (NYU) & Feng Gu (SUNY-Buffalo), The End of Accounting (Wiley, June 27, 2016) (WSJ excerpt): The problem with reported earnings, and financial statements in general, is that they no longer reflect the realities of businesses. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:02 pm by Thomas & Pearl
 Wiley said that the gator in Disney World probably confused the toddler for a dog or a raccoon. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
John Wiley & Sons, in which the Court weighed in on the standard for fee-shifting under the Copyright Act, and concludes that the decision “does not break much new ground. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:28 am by Ron Coleman
 In the three years that have passed since the Supreme Court’s previous ruling, the case has returned to the district court, where Kirtsaeng is now seeking an award of attorney’s fees from Wiley. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:06 am by 500law
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016 WL 205944 (Jan. 15, 2016), which sought determination of the proper standard for attorneys’ fees awards in copyright cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:06 am by 500law
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016 WL 205944 (Jan. 15, 2016), which sought determination of the proper standard for attorneys’ fees awards in copyright cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:18 am by Terry Hart
” Opinion analysis: Court clarifies availability of fee awards in copyright cases — Yesterday, the Supreme Court released its decision in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, which is an iteration of its 1994 Fogerty v Fantasy decision providing guidance on what courts should look at when determining whether to award attorney’s fees to prevailing parties in copyright cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:21 am by Amy Howe
John Wiley & Sons, in which the Court weighed in on the standard for fee-shifting under the Copyright Act, comes from Ronald Mann for this blog. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:39 pm by Ronald Mann
John Wiley & Sons, announced earlier on Thursday morning – with the bulk of the opinion rejecting one after another of the arguments offered to justify reversal of the lower court opinion, followed by a surprise turn at the end of the opinion as the Court finds just one point sufficient to justify reversal. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm by Andrew Hamm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the Court held that a district court deciding whether to award attorney’s fees under the Copyright Act’s fee-shifting provision should give substantial weight to the objective reasonableness of the loser’s position, while still taking into account all other relevant circumstances. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., No. 15-375, is a copyright case on the question of attorney's fees for a prevailing defendant. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:30 am by David Kravets
Wiley, the court's 2013 decision involving the rights of those who buy copyrighted works. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 am by EEM
Opportunity:CFP: "Protecting the Invisibles: LGBTI Refugees in the Context of EU-Turkey Migration Policies," Panel at the Human Security Implications of the Refugee Crisis: Evaluating Current Policies and Discussing Potential Solutions, Istanbul, 19-21 October 2016 [info]- Submit abstract by 30 June 2016.Resources:"Gender and Asylum," Entry in the Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies (Wiley Blackwell, March 2016) [text via Academia.edu]Incorporating Sexual and… [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 8:21 am by Dennis Crouch
 John Wiley & Sons (2016), the Supreme Court has vacated the Second Circuit’s ruling denying attorney-fee awards in the copyright case – but offered a balanced opinion that places a number of limits on when fees may be awarded. [read post]