Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 8,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
In the case of Reconstruction and the New Deal Ackerman emphasized the importance of conservative resistance by one branch of the national government, either the President (during Reconstruction) or the Court (during the New Deal). [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:46 am
The Project calls for new "statutory language to clarify that judges, not the executive branch, have the final say about whether disputed evidence is subject to the state secrets privilege. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
Before 1965, the Extension Service was divided into two branches: a white branch and a “Negro branch. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
Before 1965, the Extension Service was divided into two branches: a white branch and a “Negro branch. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 10:38 am
Flores (for finding Congress overstepped its Section 5 powers) and U.S. v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 6:18 am
(quoting Vieth v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
The President is being treated as a defacto "supreme court" within the Executive Branch, who has the last word. [read post]
19 May 2007, 11:10 am
See County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 2:17 am
Darby and Wickard v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 12:35 am
" Given that like arguments have been made in other, pending litigation, Payne concludes that the roles of the branches of federal government, and of agencies of constituent states, are likely to evolve. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
(OLC's legal judgments are binding within the Executive branch, except in the rare cases where they are overridden by OLC itself, the Attorney General, or the President.) [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:20 pm
" United States v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:19 pm
Isn't it the prerogative of the administration to realign the mission of executive branch agencies to comport with the electoral mandate? [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
And on the merits, the military's highly inadequate Combatant Status Review Tribunals, which decide what suspects to incarcerate as "enemy combatants," do provide protections consistent with the Geneva Conventions and the Supreme Court's 2004 Hamdi v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 6:01 pm
The big news tomorrow today is going to be oral argument scheduled before the Supreme Court in Elizabeth Kerrigan et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The following is a glossary of a broad list of legal terms, civil and criminal, state and federal and not just those in a divorce or family law case. [read post]
6 May 2007, 3:47 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
