Search for: "Corporations 1 through 5" Results 7981 - 8000 of 8,722
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2009, 6:57 pm
Manager, International Corporate Services, Really Big Accounting Firm, Chicago (new title effective 1 July). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:56 pm by Tom McLain
McCann explains that "about 60% of the company's executive team has joined through deals. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
Bush [4] and his administration for their actions in Iraq, including his declaration of pre-emptive war and his support of CIA-operated rendition sites and torture practices. [5] -President Bill Clinton [5] and his administration for working through the United Nations Security Council to impose sanctions on Iraq between 1990-2003 and for the NATO bombing of Bosnia in 1999. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
Art.5(1)(a) is wider than Art.5(1)(b) [thus confusion isn't required] and while descriptive use, e.g. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 8:36 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise, of Defendants sued herein as DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, are currently unknown to PLAINTIFFS, who therefore sue said Defendants by such fictitious names. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
 If, on the other hand, Venturi neither identified the party providing financing nor negotiated the financing, then Pacific Malibu owed Venturi only 1 percent of the placement's proceeds. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:00 am
  The company is expected to invest more than $1 billion in the project over nine years. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 12:05 am
L. had drafted a petition against a Manitoba corporation (call it “XYZ Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 11:10 pm
On May 5, 2009, AlwaysOn released the following:AlwaysOn, the insider's network covering the business of innovation, today announced its AlwaysOn East 100 Top Private Companies List. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Lowering the bar to 1% (and permitting even smaller shareholders to aggregate their stakes for purposes of achieving the 1% threshold), in contrast to the 5% threshold in our model access bylaw, gives activist and special interest holders a very low cost avenue to seek to influence board composition and corporate strategy. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 10:24 am
  Such a determination requires a fact-specific inquiry taking into consideration four factors:  "(1) common ownership between the parent and subsidiary; (2) the financial dependency of the subsidiary on the parent corporation; (3) the degree to which the parent corporation interferes in the selection and assignment of the subsidiary's executive personnel and fails to observe corporate formalities; and (4) the degree of control over… [read post]