Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 48,971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2017, 12:20 pm
Slip Op. 05760 (2d Dept., 2017) the parties stipulation provided that the defendant was entitled to 50% of the marital portion of the plaintiff’s pension and that the parties were to cooperate with each other in obtaining a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) to divide the pension, that they would equally share the cost of preparing the QDRO, and that the defendant’s share would be determined pursuant to the formula set forth in Majauskas v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:00 am
The Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court's ruling, on the law, with costs, and confirmed the Trustees' determination and dismissed Petitioner's CPLR Article 78 proceeding on the merits. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 12:59 pm
In A.H. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:36 am
Skinner v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 8:47 pm
Dowling v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's judgment, with costs. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:00 am
The Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court's ruling, on the law, with costs, and confirmed the Trustees' determination and dismissed Petitioner's CPLR Article 78 proceeding on the merits. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 11:30 pm
Scott v Education Management Corp., USCA, Third Circuit, No. 15-2177. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:55 pm
Germain v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 9:35 pm
Now, in UnitedStates v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 1:34 pm
Oake v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 7:24 am
Although it was anticipated that the cost of filing trademarks and designs in Egyptwould increase, this has been placed on hold. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Equal pay for equal work Subway Surface Supervisors Assn. v New York City Tr. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 1:32 pm
Connell v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 6:03 pm
Towers v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 9:08 am
ADAMS v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Alternatively, Capita asserted that (A) only qualified (2) and that it could therefore recover from Mr Wood as the remediation scheme was a “loss, costs, charge, expense or liability suffered or incurred” under (1) and was only qualified by (B). [read post]
26 May 2012, 8:00 am
Nature Conservancy v. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 11:11 am
Read: The August 4, 2010 Perry v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
” Cel-Tech Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
