Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 7981 - 8000 of 32,312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2020, 2:22 pm by Tom Goldstein
That said, with no perfect precedent to go by, the Spanish flu probably does present the best model for the court to handle the coronavirus pandemic. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:31 am by Aron Laszlo (Oppenheim Legal)
On the other hand, the intermediary’s services are used by a third party to infringe an intellectual property right pursuant to Articles 8 to 11 of the Enforcement Directive. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 4:48 am by SHG
Colvin does not believe he was price gouging. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 10:17 am by Eugene Volokh
Perdue, a 2012 federal district court case from North Carolina struck down certain North Carolina statutes related to guns in emergencies: The first statute, North Carolina General Statute § 14-288.7, makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor "for any person to transport or possess off his own premises any dangerous weapon or substance in any area" in which a state of emergency has been declared. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
—In this section: (1) The term “eligible child” means a child (as defined in section 12(d) or served under section 11(a)(1) of the Richard B. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by luiza
Read More: Healthcare Fraud Read As COVID-19 Spreads, So Does Consumer Fraud at constantinecannon.com [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 11:33 am by Casie Collignon
We previously discussed this issue, noting that Section 1798.150 of the CCPA is not expressly retroactive and does not expressly apply to conduct that took place prior to Jan. 1, 2020, but that the CCPA’s 12-month lookback, combined with entrepreneurial plaintiffs’ counsel, could lead to lawsuits over data incidents predating 2020. [read post]
The AEPD indicates that controllers may rely on one of the following legal bases under Article 6 GDPR: processing that is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation under EU or national law; (Article 6(1)(c) GDPR) The AEPD gives the example of the employer’s obligation to prevent occupational hazards under Spanish labor law; processing that is necessary in order to protect the vital interest of the data subjects or another natural person; (Article 6(1)(d) GDPR) and The… [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:11 am
" The Board found the identification of goods to be indefinite for two reasons: (1) it refers to specific class numbers. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm by MOTP
Moss contends that Smith lacks constitutional standing,[6] which requires that he establish that he "(1) suffered an injury in fact, (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the defendant, and (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm by Public Employment Law Press
.], entered June 8, 2018), dismissed, without costs.The Commissioner's finding of discrimination is supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 2:04 pm by Nicola Whiteley
If the local Health Protection Team does not get in touch (which is possible, given the pressure they may be under), the employer will need consent from the employee to pro-actively reach out to the HPT because the employee’s health is a matter of privacy for that individual. [read post]