Search for: "English v. English" Results 7981 - 8000 of 11,204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 2:09 am by Martin George
The extraordinarily long-running litigation in Masri v Consolidated Contractors is over – the parties have settled. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:49 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Street v Mountford In 1985 there was a landmark case in the House of Lords called Street v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:58 pm by Alex Duperouzel
See SFAT’s Decision (Wan Ten Lok and Yan Kwok Ting Sunny v SFC, Application No 8 and 9 of 2009) published on the SFAT’s website at http://www.sfat.gov.hk/english/determination/AN-8_9-2009-Determination.pdf, para 163, para 172-182, para 192-193, para 194 -204 respectively.5. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Lucasfilm’s claim in essence was that the helmets were “sculptures” within the meaning of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and that its copyright was therefore protected under English law. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
In Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40, [2011] All ER (D) 246 (Jul), the Supreme Court heard its second arbitration case, after Dallah Real Estate v Pakistan [2010] UKSC 46, [2011] 1 All ER 485 reported previously in these pages (see NLJ, 21 January 2011, p 104). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:43 am by Isabel McArdle
As we have reported, in May 2011 the Supreme Court ruled in R (on the application of GC) (FC) (Appellants) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal, Oban) (Scotland) Her Majesty’s Advocate v G (Scotland) Her Majesty’s Advocate v M (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 October 6, 2011 Supreme Court: Scottish prosecutions based on questioning by police pre-detention without access to lawyer not ECHR breach. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:48 am by Jon
Massanari, 266 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2001), citing Anastasoff v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:44 am by Jon
Prior to a major change to federal court rules in 2007,about one-fifth of federal appellate cases were published and therebybecame binding precedents, while the rest were unpublished and boundonly the parties to each case. [38] As Judge Alex Kozinski has explained, binding precedent as we know ittoday simply did not exist at the time the Constitution was framed. [38]Judicial decisions were not consistently, accurately, and faithfullyreported on both sides of the Atlantic (reporters often simply… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
Ambrose Harris (Procurator Fiscal), HM Advocate v G : HM Advocate v M [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) – read judgment Reliance on evidence that emerged from questioning a person without access to a lawyer did not invariably breach the right to a fair trial under Article 6. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Newsru LTD (The IP Factor)   Netherlands Major Usenet provider ordered to remove all infringing content (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom Expedited trials in English patent actions – HTC v Apple (judgment of Arnold J on 19th September 2011) (Kluwer Patent Blog) Newzbin2 team up with The Pirate Bay to defeat site blocking (TorrentFreak) EWHC (Pat): Halliburton gets simulation patent after all: Halliburton Energy Services v Comptroller-General of Patents… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:20 am by Giorgio Buono
Here’s the table of contents of issue 2/2011 (each contribution is accompanied by an abstract in English): Estudios José Mª Alcántara, Frazer Hunt, Svante O. [read post]