Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 7981 - 8000 of 76,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Joy Waltemath
An employee who testified unfavorably to his former employer in an arbitration proceeding and then had his shares of stock called days after the arbitration decision was finalized, thereby losing out on $540,000 in dividends for that year, plausibly alleged that the company breached its covenant of good faith and fair dealing by retaliating against him for his testimony in violation of public policy, concluded an Eighth Circuit panel, reversing the dismissal of his claim (Kmak v… [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” Argument recap: The constitutionality of zombie copyrights — Rebecca Tushnet provides some thoughts on last week’s oral arguments in Golan v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
No, says the Dutch Court of Appeal in The Hague, although its reasoning is a little creative when it comes to its application of EU trade mark law.The decision is Zhu v Great Blue Sky Internationaland dates back to December 2013. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:20 am
Goods or services that are dissimilar to the opponent’s marks goods or services can be divided from goods that may be sufficiently similar. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 3:19 pm by Unknown
Interview: Fighting and winning with Louise ErdrichSeminole Museum to Smithsonian: 'No more stolen ancestors''Be good to each other' (and share a virtual coffee) [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 9:28 pm by Sme
App., November 14, 2014) (affirming denial of benefits because petitioner voluntarily quit without good cause)Albers v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:55 am by Anita Bernstein
June Medical Services LLC in this appellate incarnation has approved a law with no beneficial effect (unless one thinks that blocking lawful abortion is good for health, a motive for state action that Roe v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am by INFORRM
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 11:12 pm
Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd owns the trade mark, which is registered in Singapore in Classes 9, 18 and 25 for various goods, including spectacles, leather goods, and articles of clothing. [read post]