Search for: "I v. B"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 24,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
The IPKat wonders whether this is the first intellectual property ruling (i) to be referred from Bulgaria or (ii) for which the language of the proceedings is Bulgarian. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:00 pm
First, "[b]ased on DNA evidence, the man was later identified as Victor Cruz, a bus boy at Here Lounge. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 10:21 am
., S.A. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:09 am
Yesterday, Graf von Westphalen--the law firm that represents the defendant, Datel Group--issued a press release as well (in German, too), from which I learned the names of the parties, which the court itself was not allowed to reveal.In the IP law community, this case will, however, be widely referred to as Sony v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:19 pm
Billion with a B. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:16 am
However, used descriptively is ruled legal [Mind Candy Ltd v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:45 am
In other words, if no exceptions are filed, "the decision and recommended order, or any part thereof, which concludes that a charge should be dismissed, in whole or in part, will be final" (4 NYCRR 204.14[b]). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:10 pm
I’ll be posting more on this decision within the coming week, so stay tuned… [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:19 pm
.; Bryan F. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:24 am
In last week’s case (Gulbrandsen v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 2:02 am
On May 2, 2013, the ITC's Administrative Law Judge Thomas B. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:13 pm
I am satisfied that the defendants here do not seek a purely tactical advantage, as the Court found in Phillips v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:41 pm
In Pew v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm
CITATION: Quizno's Canada Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:24 am
People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
Tosti stated, `The above items both my husband, Donald Tosti and I use. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Specifically, I’m going to be talking about privacy and news reporting. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 7:34 am
State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:09 pm
I’m not wholly persuaded that this is right. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:30 pm
Other conditions were also considered in the comparable agreement – (i) whether the licensing territorial scope similarly involved China, (ii) whether the number of mobile phones that utilize the six patents by Company B and Oppo have crossed 100 million, and (iii) whether the agreement was concluded through the process of standard licensing negotiations and represented the market value of the patents in question. [read post]
