Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL" Results 7981 - 8000 of 15,752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2016, 5:09 pm by Goldberg Jones
The courts don’t take such rulings lightly, and you must prove it’s in the best interest of the children. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Department of Justice RE:      Comment on Proposed Rulemaking entitled “Standards and Procedures for the Enforcement of the Immigration and Nationality Act,” 81 Fed. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  District court rules that Amazon isn’t liable, but said it was troubled by that conclusion and impact on small retailers. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
§ 102, 103 and 112Moderator: Daniel Gajewski, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox: Issues include continuation practice; maybe new rules coming. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
” The Labor Department, in announcing the rule, had reasoned that “[t]axpayer dollars should not reward companies that break the law, and contractors who meet their legal responsibilities should not have to compete with those who do not. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:03 pm by Vera Ranieri
The brief also details how the rule has significant, substantive effects on cases that, without correction, will continue to create ongoing harms. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:39 am by Eric Goldman
[Two other notes about how much I dislike the court’s Bollaert opinion: In discussing the identity theft charge, the opinion favorably cites the In re Rolando S. ruling–always a red flag. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 7:38 am by Lucy Checkley
In 2015, the Supreme Court ruled that the beach in Newhaven Port v East Sussex should not be registered as a TVG, contrary to the Court of Appeal in 2013. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage of Tuesday’s oral arguments continues. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:47 pm by Dykema
Significantly, the court notes that “[w]e need not here consider the legal ramifications of our decision for past CFPB rules or for past agency enforcement actions,” because “the CFPB’s enforcement action against PHH in this case must be vacated in any event. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 9:41 am by Rich Vetstein
 “We’re hopeful this will address any uncertainty moving forward and offer a clear road ahead for any of our members who have entered into MSAs with settlement service providers,” Salomone continued. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 5:37 am by Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard P.C.
” Medical Resident Work-Hour Limits are a Bipartisan Concern “Medical residents are not superhuman, and when they’re not getting sleep, they’re putting patients in harm’s way,” Dr. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:39 am by Karen Jensen
Court of Appeal recently gave employers a much-needed reminder: they’re entitled to reasonable notice too. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:41 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We’ll continue innovating, refining, and working diligently to ensure we’re doing everything we can to make Uber the safest experience on the road. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:13 am
Application to re-amend DefenceThis decision concerned an application by Servier to re-amend its Defence, in a form which can be summarised as follows:1. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Seating is limited, so if you’re interested, act quickly! [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 10:32 am by Chris Jaglowitz
Over the summer, Ottawa backed off from prohibiting growing marijuana in residences following a court ruling that the ban was unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 10:32 am by Chris Jaglowitz
Over the summer, Ottawa backed off from prohibiting growing marijuana in residences following a court ruling that the ban was unconstitutional. [read post]