Search for: "Laws v. Laws"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 269,310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Constant pressure from Shark Champions, and our nomination for the skate to be listed as Critically Endangered under Australia’s nature laws has put it at the top of the Federal Government’s conservation priorities. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:42 pm
One of these cases challenges a new immigration law in Texas that looks highly suspect under Arizona v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:49 pm
From today's nonprecedential decision in John Doe P v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm
Sex buyers, or johns, will be a particular focus for law enforcement during this big event. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:43 pm
" Juliana v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:34 pm
In 1985, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the law in Fischer v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
” Article I, Sec. 8: The Congress shall have Power … To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
United States remains good law. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:09 am
Section 1738.Here, in Rush v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
The case of Howard Schmill v. [read post]
Damages sought for false arrest. Macareno v. City of New York, 187 A.D.3d 1164 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
29 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
The case of Albaum v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am
Delia Guerrero et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:38 am
W. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:37 am
United States) Cóman Kenny, Prosecutor v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:04 am
” Cavitt v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:25 am
In People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:18 am
In a highly publicized and widely discussed case, Mata v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:02 am
Aldi must definitely be feeling vindicated, having proven itself to be on the right side of the law several times now. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]