Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 119,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2013, 8:38 am
In Dennis v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Third Circuit Reaffirms that Even Nonviolent Felons May Lose Second Amendment Rights
16 Nov 2022, 11:49 am
The case is Range v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 9:21 am
A coordinated effort between private and government actors to censor ideas, no matter how contentious or offensive those ideas may be, offends the First Amendment. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am
Typically employees appointed to positions in the classified service* of the State of New York or a political subdivision of the State are subject to their satisfactory completion a probationary period defined in terms of a "minimum period of probation" and a "maximum period of probation. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am
Typically employees appointed to positions in the classified service* of the State of New York or a political subdivision of the State are subject to their satisfactory completion a probationary period defined in terms of a "minimum period of probation" and a "maximum period of probation. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 6:01 pm
Allen June 19, 2007 In May the Constitution Project filed an amicus brief in the case of Barbour v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 2:55 pm
In Caniglia v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:13 am
Utah May 31, 2013) Spam litigation has waned. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
Two other pending Florida Supreme Court cases that challenge portions of the state workers’ compensation law are Castellanos v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:51 pm
The Lancet – Editorial | Volume 399, ISSUE 10338, P1845, May 14, 2022. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:31 pm
May 20, 2008):Section 253(a) of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (FTA) provides: "No State or local statute or regulation, or other State or local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service". 47 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:36 pm
Ct. at 1718 (“[T]he statutes clearly contemplate that a city may engage in anticompetitive conduct. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:01 pm
Compare United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 6:57 am
A very recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada has held that a court may properly dismiss an action arising from an international commercial agreement, even after the defendant has filed a Statement of Defence: Momentous.ca Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:58 am
Regina (Shoesmith) v OFSTED and others [2011] EWCA Civ 642; [2011] WLR (D) 184 “The report of Ofsted into child safeguarding arrangements within a local authority, requested by the Secretary of State for Education following the death of a child while on the authority’s child protection register, was properly and fairly carried out under the statutory requirements of section 20 of the Children Act 2004. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
United States (involving whether the government must cross-appeal before a court of appeals may increase a criminal sentence) in April. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
"* See Matter of Barella v State of New York Off. of Mental Health, 175 AD3d 495, citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
"* See Matter of Barella v State of New York Off. of Mental Health, 175 AD3d 495, citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471. [read post]
