Search for: "Reproductive Rights"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 8,493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2008, 10:22 pm
In Bill C-60 (clause 27, new subsection 34.02(1)) anti-circumvention penalties required that circumvention be for the commercial purpose of infringing copyright, for example reproduction or communication of the work, whereas Bill C-61 (clause 31-new subsection 41.1(1)) prohibits circumvention in general and does not require infringement of an economic right in the work (thus circumvention alone is deemed an infringement). [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:20 pm
– Dionne Scott Senior Press Officer Center for Reproductive Rights [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 12:47 pm
She co-founded the international women's rights organization, Equality Now, and continues to support a woman's access to abortion, contraceptives and reproductive freedom, according to the Associated Press. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
Of Paul Caron’s Law Prof Blog Rankings, Brian Leiter has noted: “Of the top five, four have almost nothing to do with law, and four are right-wing or far right-wing in their political orientation. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:45 pm
Mice on the drugs generally remain healthy right until the end of their lives and then just drop dead. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:21 pm
Here is her post at Huffington Post (also at Reality Check) on it: The Bush administration is up to its old tricks again, quietly putting ideology before science and women's health. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 7:42 am
From its relatively modest origin as confirmation that countries of the Berne Union are entitled to permit the reproduction of copyright works "in certain special cases, provided that such reproduction does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author",[1] the scope of this legal instrument has been steadily extended. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 6:34 pm
Williams], 392 F.3d at 485 [Williams, J., concurring], after sleeping on the matter, we are convinced that sleep is a vital life activity in its own right. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:29 pm
Try at [www.janusinfo.se] — click links on right - go in and see how your medication is classified!! [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:29 am
If you right it down, it will be used against you in a lawsuit. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Apple has not licensed or otherwise authorized Defendant’s reproduction, distribution or display of the Copyrighted Works. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 8:26 pm
The voters have a right to know. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 3:41 am
Traditionally, the royalty was paid by record companies to the music publishers for rights to use the compositions in the pressing of records. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 2:22 pm
Many women undergo hysterectomies to take care of fibroids and other reproductive troubles, when there are alternative procedures that are not as drastic and profitable. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 11:24 am
Article 75 (1) states: When technological measures applied by owners of copyright, related rights and sui generis rights prevent the users of such rights from benefiting from the limitations of copyright, related rights and sui generis rights, provided for in paragraph 1 of Article 20 . . . the users of the rights must be provided with conditions or adequate means (i.e. decoding devices and other) enabling to use legitimately… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
Politico: Obama walks the abortion minefield, by Carrie Budoff Brown: For the past week, some activists in the abortion rights community have been trying to figure out why Barack Obama, a Democrat praised for his strong defense of reproductive rights,... [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 11:40 pm
On reproductive rights: [more ...] [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:31 pm
To some, marriage was (and is) "a one-flesh communion of persons consummated and actualized in the reproductive-type acts of spouses"â€â [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:07 am
By chance the winning bidder reads it and has a glass expert confirm his suspicions: It's a reproduction. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
This issue includes an exploration of the new Australian 'parody' defence to an action for copyright infringement by Jani McCutcheon, who lectures at the University of Western Australia (the IPKat says, he's looking forward to an exhibition of bad reproductions of the doggie pic in Rogers v Koons, which seem to spring up wherever satire and parody are discussed). [read post]
