Search for: "State v. Bodi" Results 7981 - 8000 of 14,867
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
The Georgia Court of Appeals just handed down a verdict in First Bank of Georgia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:04 am by MBettman
On October 30, 2013, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:59 am by Susan McLean
On 5 June 2014 the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its decision in the “Meltwater” Case C-360/13, (Public Relations Consultations Association Ltd (PRCA) v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd (NLA) and Others). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:31 pm
The Governing Body and Its ResponsibilitiesIn January 2000, the State Council formed the Western Region Development Leading Group headed by Premier Zhu Rongji, deputy headed by Vice Premier Wen Jiabao and attended by 19 directors from the State Council and relevant ministries. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 3:48 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Does Text Spam Class Action Against Jiffy Lube Moves Forward – In re Jiffy Lube Int’l, Inc., Text Spam Litigation California Appeals Court Says Emails That Don’t Identify Sender Violate State Spam Statute – Balsam v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm by James Kachmar
This issue was recently explored in a Ninth Circuit case titled, Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
" That, in essence is the core of the issue (nicely dressed up in the increasingly arcane language of American constitutional law) addressed in the various opinions in the Hobby Lobby case (Burwell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:58 pm
In 1992, the Supreme Court of the United States heard a case called Quill v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by John Gregory
The answer to that is generally negative, thanks to the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in Crookes v Newton in 2011. [read post]