Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 13,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 8:01 am
Crestline Hotels, and it was filed in the State Court of Fulton County. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:34 am
., et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 1:00 am
Before Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson, judgment was handed down in the case of the Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water Plc, [2014] UKSC 40 on 2nd July 2014. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:31 pm
United States (1878) to Employment Division v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 10:15 pm
Ed Whelan (Ethics and Public Policy Center) on judicial activism [Fed Soc] Tags: Cato Institute, constitutional law, eminent domain, land use and zoning Related posts Bernstein, “Rehabilitating Lochner” (0) Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:46 am
City of Albuquerque and Building Industry Assoc. of Washington v Washington State Building Code Council: preemption of local green building ordinances and codes under federal law: who is getting sued and why, and the implications for local green building code initiatives. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:16 am
He is, of course, the author of Parker v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:01 am
Kamaole Pointe Development LP v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:59 am
Subscript Law offers a graphic explainer for Kahler v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 11:48 am
There is, however, dicta in his opinion saying that the only direct taxes for which apportionment is required are capitations and land taxes. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:01 am
In Brody v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:05 pm
Sheriff v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:04 pm
No one cares if you read the magazine or own land. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:26 pm
Bennett v Hill, 2015 WL 446551 (MT 2/3/2105) The opinion can be accessed at: https://mtlawlibrary.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/opinion-bennett-et-al-v-hill-et-al/Filed under: Current Caselaw, Nuisance Tagged: golf course, spite fence [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:17 am
(Click here to see the Guggenheim v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 11:55 pm
Here's a summary: Much has been made, by both commentators and courts, of the distinction between legislative and adjudicative land use exactions used to determine whether an exaction must meet the "essential nexus" requirement of Nollan v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Oh and by the way, if you really want to see how this helps us, read United States v. [read post]
