Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 29,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2009, 1:22 pm
Supreme Court announced Monday that it will review the Ninth Circuit’s 2008 decision on employee privacy in Quon v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:23 am
Whatever the record here, NMA v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:24 am
Auth. v.] [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:43 pm
Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
That’s because the Clean Air Act only allows EPA to issue a rule to cover a state if the state doesn’t submit an adequate plan of its own; if a state later submits an adequate plan of its own, then it can exit the Rule and operate under that state plan. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
I plan to break down my thoughts into a few posts. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 8:51 am
Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
On 26 June 2018, the Secretary of State designated the ANPS under section 5(1) of the Planning Act 2008 (the “PA 2008”). [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am
(If the insurance plan's administrators failed to include the required coverage, then not only the plan itself, but Hobby Lobby, as well, would be subject to a severe tax; therefore it's fair to say that Hobby Lobby has a duty to ensure that the plan follows the law. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:39 am
Based on the California Supreme Court’s holding in Neighbors for Smart Rail v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:39 am
Based on the California Supreme Court’s holding in Neighbors for Smart Rail v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm
The case, West Virginia v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:59 am
Summit Petroleum v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
Only "Public Corporations" Can Enforce Shareholder Rights Plans In North Carolina In a decision last week by the NC Business Court, First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
In Fowler v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 10:11 am
An ERISA case added to the docket tests whether the manager of an employee benefit plan has an illegal conflict of interest if the plan gives that individual the authority both to pay benefits and to rule on eligibility for benefits (MetLife v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 1:15 am
Seff v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:45 am
Even though the Court chose not to reach these equality claims in Roe, Justice Blackmun subsequently recognized in his separate opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:20 pm
State v. [read post]
