Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 19,622
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2007, 2:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:53 am
That is the simple approach that Texas was seeking to have the Court embrace in Walker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:39 pm
First, and most importantly, is the issue of Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court - who will replace Pius Langa when he retires? [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:36 am
In the recent case (Bartel v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
On May 10, 2018, the Court granted leave in Minister of Citizenship and Immigration v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:35 am
On the issue of granting interest pendent lite, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Government of Orissa v GC Roy, the Court held that the function of an award of interest is to compensate a party for the deprivation of money to which s/he was entitled, during the pendency of the litigation. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
Justice Scalia’s 2004 concurrence in Thornton v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:47 pm
The Court will distance itself from U.S. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
And Virginia v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:22 am
King Fourth Amendment: Davis v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
Booker when the Sentencing Guidelines were still mandatory. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:20 pm
Sikes v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:22 am
Clement contended that the appeal in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:14 pm
Justice Kennedy, who was joined by Justices Roberts and Thomas, delivered the opinion of the Court with reasoning lasting a mere 16-pages. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 6:02 am
As recounted in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 10:44 am
Department of Justice. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:40 am
Yesterday, Yale lawprof Jack Balkin had to backtrack:As I suspected, Justice Scalia did not say he would have dissented in Brown v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 7:17 am
Supreme Court decided McCoy v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:29 pm
Throughout the opinion, Justice Gorsuch repeatedly argued that the Court was not endorsing policies in favor of class action waivers, and even acknowledged the policy arguments against them, while still asserting that the Court’s decision faithfully followed the applicable statutes and Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
