Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 14,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2010, 8:42 pm
” State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 1:48 pm
From Judge Paul Maloney's opinion Friday in Al Qassimi Academy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 7:19 am
ShareWednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:52 pm
The court strongly disagreed with the suggestion that the employee’s claim was “undercut by his strong work ethic or ability to withstand harassment on the job. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:27 am
Supreme Court decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:43 am
My preview of City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 10:30 am
v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
Our Supreme Court has stated Rule 4:50-1(a) “‘is designed to reconcile the strong interests in finality of judgments and judicial efficiency with the equitable notion that courts should have authority to avoid an unjust result in any given case. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
Discusses the “populist wave directed at the European Court of Human Rights and European judges generally” resulting from the decision of the Supreme Court in R (F and FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 17 [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
Heller v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:05 pm
" Kubiak v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Texas to U.S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
See Gitter v Gitter, 396 F.3d 124 (2d Cir.); Feder v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:56 am
Post-conviction non-profit lacked standing to assert First Amendment challenge to South Carolina’s law surrounding disclosure of execution protocols Justice 360 v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Then came the case of Schultz v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:37 pm
In Tison v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 4:01 pm
The defendant had a strong motive to do so. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 5:21 am
Bennett v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
Before joining the Court, Justice Kavanaugh had voiceddoubts about the soundness of the Watergate precedents, specifically, the Court’s unanimous United States v. [read post]
