Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 7981 - 8000 of 9,109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Craig N. Oren
The five Justices who voted to grant the stay are the same justices who voted for the Court’s decision last spring in Michigan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
Hence we feel it incumbent on us to reiterate that Article 136 was never meant to be an ordinary forum of appeal at all like Section 96 or even Section 100 CPC. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 2:36 pm by Michael Lowe
Powell, supra, which will be used by the federal judge in the decision to grant any Petition To Quash the IRS summons filed by t [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Were it not for the release of teasers for Bob Woodward’s new book about the terrifying levels of dysfunction in Donald Trump’s White House, the Senate hearings on Trump’s Supreme Court nominee would have completely dominated the news this week. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:32 pm by Carter Ruml
In the case before us, it is not the role of the courts to evaluate how well the trustee is performing his duties. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:32 pm by Carter Ruml
In the case before us, it is not the role of the courts to evaluate how well the trustee is performing his duties. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 5:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant-wife's counterclaim contains allegations which, if true, may rise to the level of spousal abuse. [read post]
It should also be noted that Google used geo-blocking to stop a user apparently in an EU Member State from accessing the content de-referenced in the Google search page in his/her Member State through a search page of a non-EU Member State where the content was not de-referenced. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
To the contrary, our ruling is limited to the specific facts of this case, based on the summary judgment record before us. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:02 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, the employer was vicariously liable for the manager’s actions because, although it had an anti-discrimination policy, it had not met its burden of showing that it actually enforced it (EEOC v US Dry Cleaning Services Corp, June 4, 2014, Magnus-Stinson, J). [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm by Ed Gehres
The Court’s grant of certiorari rightfully alarmed tribal advocates and federal Indian law experts. [read post]