Search for: "United States v. Heard"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 8,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Garcia, No. 07-40245 A conviction for drug-related offenses is reversed and remanded for a new trial where: 1) during rebuttal closing argument, the government improperly bolstered its key witnesses, the agents who heard defendant's unrecorded confession; and 2) such bolstering constituted reversible plain error, which seriously affected the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of the proceedings. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 1:57 am
Even most non-lawyers know that the United States uses an a adversarial system of justice in both civil and criminal law. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 11:01 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
The court will answer a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:38 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 9:45 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 7:47 am
It has decided every case it heard in November except for United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
It assumes there is a "making available" right in the United States, which even the RIAA knows is not so -- as evidenced by its removal of that theory from its complaints once Judge Brewster held that its complaint fails to state a claim in Interscope v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
" The plan states that such Fed actions "should be coordinated and implemented with the appropriate regulatory agency to the fullest extent possible. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 11:40 am
On March 25, 2008, the Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 12:46 am
On Wednesday, March 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:00 pm
The United States, of course, should live up to its treaty commitments. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
In its appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Indiana v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:59 pm
A telltale sign of his woe: Justice John Paul Stevens, whose vote Margulies almost certainly needs, seemed close to bafflement about that side of the argument as the Court heard the consolidated cases of Munaf v. [read post]
