Search for: "V. JACKSON" Results 7981 - 8000 of 9,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 10:06 pm
Nguyen, 2006 BCSC 605, 149 A.C.W.S. (3d) 419, where the award for non-pecuniary damages was $90,000, and  Jackson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 7:52 am
According to police reports, the 44-year-old man was driving a 2006 Honda CR-V when he was pulled over by law enforcement officers at Valley Road and Church Street. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
A "rule of reason" (Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Development Corp., 67 NY2d at 417) is applicable not only to an agency's judgments about the environmental concerns it investigates, but to its decisions about which matters require investigation. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
A "rule of reason" (Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Development Corp., 67 NY2d at 417) is applicable not only to an agency's judgments about the environmental concerns it investigates, but to its decisions about which matters require investigation. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:28 am
Now a radical review of costs is being carried out by Lord Justice Jackson. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
Would you give your child, or your favorite King-of-Pop fan, this toy (yes, it’s a Michael Jackson sock monkey)? [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Iqbal v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:16 am
Apart, perhaps, from a videotape of the crime, one would have difficulty finding evidence more damaging to a criminal defendant's plea of innocence.Justice Kennedy, concurring in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:17 am
On October 15, 2009, the Court of Appeals published its unanimous decision in People v. [read post]