Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 8001 - 8020 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
United States Postal Service, [985 F.2d 440, 442 (8th Cir. 1993)]; Kreppein v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
RUSSO & APOZNANSKI, Cross-Claimant, -against- MONTFORT, HEALY, MCGUIRE & SALLEY, LLP, Cross-Claim Defendant, MONTFORT, HEALY, MCGUIRE & SALLEY, LLP, Cross-Claimant, -against- RUSSO & APOZNANSKI, Cross-Claim Defendant, 07-CV-2514 (JS) (AKT);  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2010 U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:01 am
Bond Schoeneck & KingAn interesting case from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky addresses a particularly difficult religious accommodation question: at what point can an employer prohibit an employee from expressing religious views in the workplace? [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm
Ct. 1640 (2010) (Apr. 21, 2010), the United States Supreme Court held that a plan adminstrator’s discretionary authority to interpret a plan is entitled to deference, even if a prior determination with regard to the same claim was invalid.Estate planning with retirement assetsArnstein & LehrFor many individuals, retirement benefits represent a significant portion of their wealth.Second Circuit finds that class arbitration waiver clause is unconscionable, refuses… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:50 am by Jon Hyman
United Air Lines, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
HART, CPA; and MOORE & HART, CPA, 6:09-CV-920;UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2010 U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:06 am by Jed
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Timothy S. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:11 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
  PRC had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on January 23, 2008. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Deere & Co., 769 N.W.2d 536 (Wis. 2009) (Gableman, Prosser & Rogensack, JJ. concurring); Godoy v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm by Kelly
Hulu LLC (271 Patent Blog) District Court C D California: Proof that accused device ‘could be modified to infringe’ is insufficient to support finding of infringement: Phoenix Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]