Search for: "ANDREW DOE" Results 8001 - 8020 of 9,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Eric Cummings and Andrew Kingsbury have a preview at Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 9:41 am by Kali Borkoski
Why does this happen, and has this been a consistent feature of the Court’s docket? [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:15 pm by ALeonard
Although the state’s marriage statute does not permit same-sex couples to marry in Maryland, and that statute was upheld in a narrow 5-4 vote by the state’s highest court in 2007 in Conaway v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:30 am by Ilya Somin
Andrew Hyman recently made a similar argument at the Originalism Blog. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:00 pm by Ad Law Defense
Nov. 8, 2017) citing Andrews v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 5:09 am by Beatrice Yahia
Andrew Gray and Charlotte Van Campenhout report for Reuters. [read post]
While the UPC qualifies to submit request for preliminary rulings to the CJEU in accordance with Article 267 of the TFEU, the PMAC does not. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Amy Howe
” Justice Elena Kagan also seemed dubious, telling Curran that the FSIA does not specify that the mailing be sent to the foreign minister “at his own office. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 1:36 pm
The Public Record does a good job of explaining John Yoo's role in advising Bush that it's okay to circumvent the 4th Amendment, as far back as October, 2001 and perhaps earlier, to days after the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
  That does rather require some crystal ball gazing: when will the first instance trial be listed? [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 4:59 pm by Giles Peaker
I am prompted to do so by an excellent article in the Journal of Housing Law (Vol 17 Issue 1) by Andrew Dymond of Arden Chambers. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:21 am by Steve McConnell
It may be that he does this just because these sorts of mistakes are more common than we'd like to admit, and because it's important that they be addressed. [read post]
Andrew Yates points out that “an inherent-power doctrine that reserves the power only for absolutely necessary situations and requires a specific constitutional violation will provide judicial systems a useful legal avenue for protecting the critical services that courts provide. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 8:47 am
BP spokesman David Nicholas told Risk & Governance Weekly that the company does not count votes withheld as cast either "for" or "against. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Wessen Jazrawi
The Australian experience Professor George Williams educated us about the Australian system, which does not have any national human rights legislation. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Jonathan Bailey
One of the most important being, “Why does this story feel so familiar? [read post]