Search for: "AT&T Services Inc. " Results 8001 - 8020 of 17,734
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Not much of a legal argument, but one can't really expect much of a legal argument from someone who isn't legally trained. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
 More recently, in Fenty v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop)  [2013] EWHC 2310 (noted by the IPKat here), pop star Rihanna succeeded in her claim for passing off against retail giant Topshop, who used her image on a t-shirt without her permission. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:32 pm by Gene Quinn
Kirsch, P.A.), Paul Allen (Marksmen Inc.) and Christian Sanchelima (Sanchelima & Associates). [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:01 am
Huber, and Charles Shi, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Tuesday, May 8, 2018 Tags: Asset management, Corporate Social Responsibility, DOL, Engagement, ERISA, ESG, Fiduciary duties, Institutional Investors, Investment advisers, Proxy voting The Uncertain Role of IPOs in Future Securities Class Actions Posted by Jeff Lubitz, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., on Wednesday, May 9, 2018 … [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 6:06 am by Eric Goldman
Rightscorp’s robo-notices don’t constitute unfair competition. * Incredible Features, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am by William C. Martinez
., Inc., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted in part Amazon Web Services (“Amazon”) and Pindrop Security’s (“Pindrop”) motion to dismiss a proposed class action brought pursuant to BIPA for lack of standing, based on a strict interpretation of the definitions of “biometric identifiers” and “biometric information” and the plaintiffs’ failure to adequately allege that they suffered any… [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am by William C. Martinez
., Inc., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted in part Amazon Web Services (“Amazon”) and Pindrop Security’s (“Pindrop”) motion to dismiss a proposed class action brought pursuant to BIPA for lack of standing, based on a strict interpretation of the definitions of “biometric identifiers” and “biometric information” and the plaintiffs’ failure to adequately allege that they suffered any… [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 12:19 pm by Arielle E. Katz
Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc., the Eighth Circuit reversed and remanded a district court’s decision that had denied both a motion to strike class action allegations and a motion to compel arbitration. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 12:19 pm by Arielle E. Katz
Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc., the Eighth Circuit reversed and remanded a district court’s decision that had denied both a motion to strike class action allegations and a motion to compel arbitration. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 12:19 pm by Arielle E. Katz
Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc., the Eighth Circuit reversed and remanded a district court’s decision that had denied both a motion to strike class action allegations and a motion to compel arbitration. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am by William C. Martinez
., Inc., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted in part Amazon Web Services (“Amazon”) and Pindrop Security’s (“Pindrop”) motion to dismiss a proposed class action brought pursuant to BIPA for lack of standing, based on a strict interpretation of the definitions of “biometric identifiers” and “biometric information” and the plaintiffs’ failure to adequately allege that they suffered any… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:30 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
Section 230 was enacted as a response to Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. [read post]