Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 8001 - 8020 of 10,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
That distinguishes us from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand which all have constitutional or rights charter requirements that proposed laws must be considered for their potential impact on free expression. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Rachel Bovard argues that “[i]f Google prevails” in Google v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 1:24 pm by Jeff Rasansky
 was a landmark case from 1928 which helped establish the concept of proximate cause and foreseeability in the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Conor McEvily
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:35 am by Erica Gann Kitaev
The court certified a class for purposes of settlement of “[a]ll current and former ‘Blockbuster’ members in the United States and its territories and possessions” and preliminarily approved the settlement agreement. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:16 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in the Denver Post, Joseph Smith Jr. weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm by Patricia Salkin
Lastly, Counts V, VI, and VII were all found ripe because they alleged state law violations or sought injunctive relief based on the enactment of the three ordinances. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:08 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The United States Congress debates bills for weeks, sometime months, prior to passage, all of which you can see on the Library of Congress' Thomas service, or on the non-profit OpenCongress.org. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:59 am by Dianne Saxe
Are our federal courts  really less capable than courts in the United States? [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:26 am by Mike
Access Group notes that the minimum standard of living identified in [United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In the United States following the Revolutionary War, liberties were jealously guarded by the states. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by Christopher Walker
United States Aid Funds, Inc., a case from the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:16 pm by Robert Oszakiewski
However, the areas covered by the review would be greatly reduced from (1) an evaluation of the technical accomplishments of the Program, including a review of whether the Program has achieved the goals under the metrics established by the Council; (2) a review of the Program’s management and coordination across agencies and disciplines; (3) a review of the funding levels at each agency for the Program’s activities and the ability of each agency to achieve the Program’s… [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:17 pm by Florian Mueller
In this regard, they've made concessions lately--concession that in my view don't go far enough to address competition concerns, but which nevertheless represent (limited) progress.On June 10, 2022, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California formally approved (PDF) a class-action settlement between small app developers and Apple. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 11:41 am by Adam Young and Elizabeth Blickley
District Court for the District of Arizona’s recent order in Stenson Tamaddon LLC v. [read post]