Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 8,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2007, 4:49 pm
Subsequent to the trial court's response to the jury note, the State filed a motion to reconsider. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:06 pm
King v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 12:32 pm
He must have done more, brought much more pressure on the Government of the day, to get the State Government dismissed, and impose President's rule. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:54 am
Annual salaries of state-paid judges and justices of the
5 unified court system. [read post]
2 May 2007, 7:01 am
In the recent landmark US Supreme Court case, Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 2:06 am
Annual salaries of state-paid judges and justices of the 5 unified court system. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:41 pm
In this imperfect state of affairs, if the judiciary sometimes exceeds its bounds by passing certain orders, the same should be corrected, but that is no reason for questioning the legitimacy of judicial activism and advocating judicial restraint to the point of judicial abnegation. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:25 pm
Under the [governing statute], a state-court decision can be set aside on federal habeas review only if it is "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
In Walker v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 10:00 pm
In Morrison v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 11:10 am
Board of Education and Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 4:57 am
MADISON COUNTY v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
[4] The Navy and Coast Guard are distinct branches of the military with independent chains of command. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 12:26 pm
See generally United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:14 pm
If they did, the Chevron framework in administrative law would be hard to justify-at least if Chevron is to be justified, as it is in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:09 pm
The one good thing about this case, is that it obliquely cites a case with a cool name: United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 1:33 am
See State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 2:24 pm
"); Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 12:57 pm
Recent posts include much discussion of the Supreme Court’s Mass v. [read post]
