Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 11,627
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
[v] Heinrich von Treitschke, Politics, ed. by Hans Kohn (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1963 [1898]), pp. 300-301. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:17 pm
Meanwhile Spreeuw v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:32 am
The November 2, 2011 Court of Appeals opinion in Sheila R. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:55 am
Abramic Leo Pharma A/S v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:46 am
The ACTA, which aims at strengthening the international cooperation and increasing the intellectual property enforcement standards, seeking to complement the TRIPS Agreement6 of the WTO, seems to join the “fast track” tendency of the last years to legislate on certain intellectual property issues -above all, concerning enforcement matters- through bilateral, regional or multilateral commercial treaties among specific countries. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
Romer v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:04 am
Chip Cooper, D2000-1342 (WIPO February 13, 2001). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:32 am
Faucett v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:18 am
Griffith v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
In Rehberg v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
Cooper. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 4:52 am
Watch our video on the case, made in cooperation with Nimonik. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 am
We videotaped the session, and (if tech cooperates) we will post the video. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm
In Drumm v Drumm, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4975452 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 1:31 pm
In the October 31, 2011 opinion in Burch v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
Cooper, 10-209, as both involve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims where a lawyer’s allegedly deficient advice led a defendant to reject a favorable guilty plea. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:52 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:39 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:15 am
Bear in mind, we're talking about such minimal competence as to meet the criteria of Strickland v. [read post]
