Search for: "Childs v. State"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 21,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, he heard the case Brown v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 8:16 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:28 pm
Recent Case: State of Missouri (FSD) v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 5:32 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 9:25 am
In Windsor v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 5:35 pm
In Neave v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 10:58 am
–State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 8:08 am
California's Fifth Appellate District held recently in King v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:25 pm
The judge awarded Mr Monir £40,000 in damages and costs, and said in his judgment: “It needs to be stated clearly: Mr Monir is completely innocent. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:55 pm
In P. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:01 pm
This is doctrinally merely a case about jurisdiction; in particular, whether California retains jurisdiction over dependency matters when it initially exercises jurisdiction (without objection by another state) even though the other state (here, Texas) says that it might reassert jurisdiction if the parents subsequently move back to that state. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:42 am
The case, captioned Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:04 am
Ricci transferred to Temple University in Philadelphia, PA, and returned to court asking that her parents be forced to pay her tuition, which now amounts to $26,000 a year.(1) In hearing the case, the judge referred to Newburgh v Arrigo, the 1982 State Supreme Court case that decided divorced parents are responsible for providing college educations for their children, and ordered Ms. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:49 am
"The decision in Fuentes v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:35 pm
America Online, 783 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 2001) (AOL not liable to harmed child for child porn generated off AOL and distributed through it); Doe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:03 am
For example, in the reported case of Mackowski v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:08 am
See, e.g., Troxel v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:22 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Penfold v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1222 (01 June 2012) Gilbert v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1221 (01 June 2012) Saunders v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1185 (01 June 2012) Sandhu v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1187 (01 June 2012) Clark & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1220 (01 June 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) B (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 737 (31 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bento v The Chief… [read post]
