Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 8001 - 8020 of 29,832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2017, 9:16 am by Hanlon Law, PA
For instance, Florida Statute Section 893.135(1)(f) establishes tiers of increasingly severe minimum sentences and fines for meth trafficking, based on the quantity of meth discovered. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:05 am by Eric Goldman
The court says: Johnson has presented facts sufficient for the Court to draw the reasonable inference that Defendants knowingly misrepresented copyright infringement to YouTube. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 5:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): 28 DCT Order An excerpt: Last, Crist also names the Sandia Pueblo Police Department as a Defendant. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 5:01 am by Bryston Gallegos
., 845 F.3d 1268 (9th Cir. 2017), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ amended class action complaint (the “Complaint”) against Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) and Mark Hurd, former CEO and Chairman of HP (“Defendants”). [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:16 pm by Joel R. Brandes
It affirmed the award because it was not an improvident exercise of the court’s discretion.The Appellate Division held that absent an agreement to the contrary, or without engaging in a proper analysis under the paragraph “(f)” factors of the Domestic Relations Law, the court should not have ordered defendant to pay for summer and/or extracurricular activities (Domestic Relations Law § 240[1–b][f]; Michael J.D., 138 AD3d at 154). [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:16 pm by Joel R. Brandes
It affirmed the award because it was not an improvident exercise of the court’s discretion.The Appellate Division held that absent an agreement to the contrary, or without engaging in a proper analysis under the paragraph “(f)” factors of the Domestic Relations Law, the court should not have ordered defendant to pay for summer and/or extracurricular activities (Domestic Relations Law § 240[1–b][f]; Michael J.D., 138 AD3d at 154). [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 8:54 am by emagraken
Or) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2011 collision which the Defendants were found liable for. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Martoma, the defendant argued that Salman did not affect Newman’s requirement that there be a “meaningfully close personal relationship” between the tipper and tippee for a personal benefit to exist absent financial gain.[17]  The defendant argued that in Salman, it was clear that such a relationship existed between the tipper and tippee because they were brothers, whereas no such “meaningfully close personal relationship” existed between the… [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
The Legislature was aware that establishing a broad right to discovery might permit parties lacking any valid cause of action to engage in fishing expeditions, to a defendant‘s inevitable annoyance. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., 789 F.3d 505 (4th Cir. 2015), the court here found that this was an impermissible lack-of-substantiation claim, and that therefore a private plaintiff can never prove falsity “when a defendant offers scientific evidence and admissible expert testimony supporting an advertising claim about the efficacy of the product in question. [read post]
The Ninth Circuit noted that two types of bellwether trials could be held when a large number of plaintiffs asserted the same or similar claims against a common defendant or defendants. [read post]