Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 8001 - 8020 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2009, 11:39 pm
The Court further emphasized that [t]he reprehensibility guidepost does not permit courts to expand the scope of the case so that a defendant may be punished for any malfeasance, which in this case extended for a 20-year period. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 6:41 am
 First, the Court reasoned that the opt-in requirement put an unnecessary burden on the defendant while relieving the corporation of no burden at all. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
In this case, the attorney conflict issue should be resolved under the “substantial relationship test” of RPC 1.9(a), that is, did defendant establish: 1) the existence of a prior attorney-client relationship involving the attorney sought to be disqualified; 2) that the current representation involves the same or a matter substantially related to the former representation; and 3) that the interests of the attorney’s current client are materially… [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
-June 2009 Percentage of defendants settled at time of filing 32% 20% This reflects not only increased enforcement activity, but particularly a willingness by the SEC to file cases against defendants in the absence of settlements. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 9:03 am
She states that they have a right to change their sexual orientation and defends the "ex-gay" concept as scientifically "unsettled" and indeed "controversial". [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 1:08 am
Furth denied the accusation and asserted that he had negotiated an excellent settlement proposal for the class that was worth $20 million to $40 million. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 10:54 am by lsammis
See LaFave Scott, 1 Substantive Criminal Law § 5.4, at 627 (1986).In this case, it appeared that the duress or necessity defense could apply because our cl [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 8:26 am
  Although Dreier's attorney had argued for a sentence of 12 and 1/2 years' imprisonment, the 20-year term that Judge Rakoff imposed was far less than the 145 year term that the government had sought in its filings (available here). [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:30 pm
If the answer to question (2) is in the negative, may the fact that the defendant participates in the proceedings before a court which otherwise under the Regulation does not have jurisdiction in a case concerning insurance, be regarded as an agreement on jurisdiction within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the Regulation? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:24 pm by John Watkins
AVVO, which rates lawyers on a scale of 1 to 10, is new and is controversial. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:36 am
PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment against Defendants and DOES 1-20, and each of them, as follows: 1) For damages for failure to provide benefits under the Policy, plus interest, including prejudgment interest in a sum according to proof at the time of trial; 2) For compensatory damages in a sum according to proof at the time of trial; 3) For general damages in a sum according to proof at the time of trial; 4) For special damages… [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 10:33 pm
In each case the defendant sought to suppress evidence obtained at MPD roadblocks. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
The pass rate for white candidates was 58.1%, 31.6% for black candidates, and 20% for Hispanic candidates. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:35 am
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing (Plaintiffs against Defendants XYZ and DOES 1-20) 29. [read post]