Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court has held that Part I of the Indian Act is excluded in cases (ii), (iii) (Dosco v Doozan; Hardy Oil) and (perhaps) (iv) (Videocon v Union of India); and that it is not excluded in case (i) (Indtel Technical Services; Citation Infowares v Equinox). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
Speaking on a recent edition of BBC Radio 4’s “Media Show”, Professor Roy Greenslade predicted that Lord Justice Leveson will probably recommend “some kind of statutory regulation” of the press at the end of his inquiry. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
"Paki-bashing" was a term that entered the English language during his teems, along with "aggro" and "skinhead". [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
e, nezlob se” (translated as "Don’t get angry, man", but known to many English readers as ludo). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
See, e.g., Vance v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:52 am
This case (Case C-442/10, Churchill Insurance Company Limited v Benjamin and Tracy Evans v Equity Claims Limited) which arose out of two references to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) made in separate cases before the English courts, concerned an issue unique to the system of vehicle insurance in the UK. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
Salmond and MacAskill were roundly condemned for their remarks, being accused of anti-Englishness and, more seriously, of threatening judicial independence and undermining the rule of law. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
Salmond and MacAskill were roundly condemned for their remarks, being accused of anti-Englishness and, more seriously, of threatening judicial independence and undermining the rule of law. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:52 am
DelaneySouthwick v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:12 am
Citing the Federal Circuit's recent decision in Therasense v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:37 pm
Myoung Ung Lee, a UW LL.M. candidate in Asian Law and former UW Visiting Scholar, gave a fascinating lecture titled Comparing Judicial Review: U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:37 pm
Myoung Ung Lee, a UW LL.M. candidate in Asian Law and former UW Visiting Scholar, gave a fascinating lecture titled Comparing Judicial Review: U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm
Michael J. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:12 am
But Austen was not the only English novelist to use the issue of entail as a plot device. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
In Filarsky v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:20 am
As has been the case in recent years, the English version has been revised to a thoroughly acceptable standard. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am
Aiyer’s judicial dictionary : a complete law lexicon Nagpur : LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa, 2011 2 v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
Conclusions at para 249: “importance of preserving life is decisive factor in case” BAH v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
I guess Filarsky v. [read post]
