Search for: "Files v. State"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 91,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2015, 10:53 am
The US Supreme Court issued its eagerly awaited decision today in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:10 pm
It also argued that well-settled mootness doctrine, as discussed in Justice Stevens’ concurrence in Friends of the Earth v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:27 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 8:24 am
Cleveland Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:22 am
The Republic of Mexico did not authorized the filing of this state lawsuit and opposed it. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 2:32 pm
Next, Brittania-U filed a motion to remand the case back to state court. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:07 pm
Plaintiffs are required to file these affidavits in many states, including Pennsylvania. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:57 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:59 am
East Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
Kolnacki v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:47 pm
Corp. of America, 732 F.Supp. 885 (1990), (People of State of Ill. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:22 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:56 am
Johnson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
Supreme Court recently denied a request to review a case called Sunbeam Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
