Search for: "In Interest of C." Results 8001 - 8020 of 42,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2008, 7:27 am
  It should make for some interesting viewing. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
§301.7122-1(c)(2)) IRS can look at the taxpayer’s expenses, such as school costs. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé : Cholette c. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé : Li c. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:23 pm by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, the court explained, New York did not have the superior interest in this lawsuit based on its interest in regulating the conduct of its licensed attorneys. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 1:53 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
And there are some really interesting “$$$” cases in this mix. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:14 pm by Matthew Gardner
Together, H & W2 raise C and treat C as their own child, even though W2 never formally adopts C as her own child. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:52 am by Steve
One of my interests of late has been child support enforcement. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, people who objected to being vaccinated on religious grounds would not be subject to the mandate unless vaccination would be, in RFRA’s language, “the least restrictive means of furthering [a] compelling governmental interest. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The case of Deckmyn v Vandersteen (Case C-201/13) on parody considers a set of questions related to the right to freedom of expression conflicting with copyright, and the impact of the Information Society (Infosoc) Directive 2001/29. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
The law is that a restraint of trade is contrary to public policy and unenforceable unless the restraint is reasonable in the parties' interests and also in the public interest: Attwood v Lamont (1920) 3 KB 371. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 7:56 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
When the Copyright Modernization Act was passed in 2012 with Bill C-11, most observers acknowledged that stronger enforcement mechanisms were needed for online piracy. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Unfair competition crept in late, in 44(h), b/c Congress believed we’d signed a treaty requiring it. [read post]