Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 8,225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
" Campbell, 510 U.S. at 599 (Kennedy, J., concur-ring). [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 7:31 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy joined the Court's liberal wing in that case because of his conclusion, rooted in constitutional history, that states warrant special solicitude when they challenge federal government inaction. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 8:11 am
The shrillness of these executed-but-innocent claims is matched only by their mendacity, as Justice Scalia demonstated in his devastating concurrence in Kansas v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:00 pm
Yesterday, in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
” (Burwell v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
Kennedy. [read post]
16 Nov 2005, 11:20 pm
(See Roper v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
"International environmental norms reflect not how states regularly behave, but how states speak to each other. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 2:40 pm
Alexis Kennedy. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
And it is the case of pedophile Patrick Kennedy, making its way through Louisiana state courts, that could render the issue moot before Texas ever sends a child rapist to death row. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
The majority effectively, though not explicitly, overruled its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:36 pm
Billing v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
See California v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
First, the Supreme Court held in Oncale v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Question: In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
