Search for: "Lowe v. State"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 9,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm
” Alito says, in reference to a statute that President Barack Obama’s administration declined to defend in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am
Current state of play The government’s newest list of priority offences (those to which the proactive duty would apply) mostly involves individuals as victims but also includes money laundering, an offence which does not do so. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am
Hacking into systems is the purview of the CFAA and state anti-hacking statutes. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
At the core of the NIRA was the idea that low profits in the industrial sectors contributed to the economic instability of those times. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:26 am
Berger v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
The new school of political economy that he created at the University of Virginia was “meant to train a new generation of thinkers to push back against Brown [v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
USA LLC, et al. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
On October 27, 2015, as previously stated, Bill 132 was introduced. [read post]
20 Mar 2021, 4:36 am
The United States District Court in Hawaii recently addressed a clear example of the latter situation in a decision from Masuda-Cleveland v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:37 am
Per court filings, the dog toy also comes with a tag stating that the product is “not affiliated with the Jack Daniel Distillery” (not pictured). [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 5:22 am
Slabakis v Olympos Trading Corp. (84 Misc 3d 1231 (A) [Sup Ct, NY County Nov. 20, 2024]), involved alleged breach of a “buyout agreement” between three owners of several corporations in the Manhattan commercial real estate business. [read post]
20 Mar 2021, 4:36 am
The United States District Court in Hawaii recently addressed a clear example of the latter situation in a decision from Masuda-Cleveland v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:41 pm
Visalia Retail, L.P. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 10:20 am
In Roverano v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
This law led to the creation of federally funded family-planning clinics across the country.This unprecedented rule imposes a gag rule on U.S. family planning clinics that are funded by Title X, the national family planning law that subsidizes care for low-income women. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 11:27 am
To the extent that Rule 702 requires a witness qualified by education, experience, or training, the bar for qualification is set very low. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:58 am
See also slip op. at 17 n.7 (distinguishing Klay v. [read post]
